Meet Playboy Models and Join a Playboy Party at Brande Roderick’s FinanciallyHung.com Social Network

FinanciallyHung.com is a Social Networking Website that enables its members to meet at any one of their well-known events. One benefit of joining FinanciallyHung.com is that you will be able to connect with Playboy models. You will also get to attend one of its red carpet and celebrity events, which is at times a Playboy party. And just like any other Social Networking Websites, you will also be able to interact with other people who can help you make all of your dreams come true, whether it be more about your personal life or your career.

FinanciallyHung.com’s cover girl and businesswoman, Brande Roderick is the brain behind this one of a kind Social Networking Website. At first, FinanciallyHung.com was planned to be used for a compelling and specialized social networking aperture that focuses on extraordinary events. But when FinanciallyHung.com attracted several different celebrities, businesspeople, Playboy models and other like-minded individuals around the United States, its Website has been updated. It is now a one of a kind Social Networking Website that allows users to create their profiles, upload pictures and videos, look for other members, send messages, post bulletins, get event discounts and interacts with tons of celebrities. Aside from being a Social Networking Website that lets its members meet personally at its various events around the United States, FinanciallyHung.com also features an online store that offers various products like T-shirts, hats, boxer shorts, polo shirt, golf balls, shot glasses, golf tees, ladies booty shorts, beater tank, bikinis, thongs and panties. Joining FinanciallyHung.com is absolutely free. With lots of business people, Playboy models, celebrities and many other notable members that you could possibly interact with on this Website, you will surely attain all of your aims in life, whether you only wish to see your favorite Playboy models and celebrities or simply meet someone who can be of great help in setting your business in motion. And what’s even cooler about this Social Networking Website is that you can advertise your company’s services or products.

For more information, visit http://www.financiallyhung.com. FinanciallyHung.com is filled with Playboy Models, celebrities, and other likeminded individuals who want to increase their business exposure and personal life to reach new heights. Owner of FinanciallyHung.com, with Brande Roderick, helps you get connected with the people of your dreams with this interactive Social Networking Website, as you are even sometimes invited to a Playboy Party.

Would you believe that Leonardo Da Vinci and Adolf Hitler were supposedly aborted babies?

When rape results in pregnancy, or when giving birth might cost the mother’s life, few women would fail to consider as an alternative: Abortion.
But let’s say you’re a doctor - physician not morally averse to terminating a patient’s pregnancy – and the circumstances are neither frivolous nor dire.
Let’s say that on a given day you are consulted by two young women, both pregnant, both doubtful as to whether they should be.
Now, remember such a choice is ultimately the mother’s but because your patient is seeking guidance, everything you say, regardless of how clinically objective – yes, even the tone of your voice – may sway here decision.
Yours is a position of enormous responsibility. Like it or not, the very expression on your face could save or extinguish a life.
Your first expectant mother is Caterina.
Caterina is unmarried, obviously in her teens, obviously poor.
You ask her age, and she tells you, and at once you realize she has overstated her years by one or two or three.
Caterina is in the first trimester of her pregnancy.
You ask if she had been pregnant before. Caterina shakes her head.
Studying her, you wonder.
You inquire of her general health; no problems, she says.
And the health of the father?
Caterina shrugs; her eyes fall.
She has lost contact with the father of her unborn child. All she knows is he was twenty three, a lawyer or a notary or something like that. He lives nearby, she thinks; she is not sure. The affair was over quickly, little more than a one night stand. No child was expected – nor how is it wanted.
What, Doctor, is your advice?
Later the same day, you are consulted by a second expectant mother.
Her name is Klara. Klara is twenty-eight, married three years, the wife of a government worker, she has the look of a women accustomed to anguish.
Concerned for the ultimate health of her unborn, Klara explains that for each year of her marriage she had a child and each had died; the first within twenty-one months, the second within sixteen months the third within several days.
Disease? You ask.
Klara nods. She suspects that any future child would be equally susceptible. For you see, her husband is also her second cousin. Both Catholics, they receive papal dispensation to marry though now Klara questions their wisdom in asking permission.
And there’s something else...
One of Klara’s sisters is a hunchback; another sister, the mother of a hunchback.
Klara is in the first trimester of her fourth pregnancy. The odds are against the health of her child. Time is running out.
And it is only later that you learn – Klara’s husband is not, as she has said, her second cousin. He is her uncle.
So what, Doctor, is your advice?
In addition to all immediate considerations – physical, moral, religious – the dilemma of whether to terminate a pregnancy is philosophical question.
Might this life, if left to live, affect the consciousness or even the destiny of mankind?
Yet if the profundity of this question is diminished by the balance which governs all life, there is evidence in the two true stories you have just read; the unwed mother with unwanted child; the married mother with the graves three infants behind her.
For if you, as the hypothetical physician, have opted in both cases for abortion – then you have respectively denied the world the multifaceted genius of Leonardo da Vinci – and spared humanity the terror of Adolf Hitler.
They are The Rest of the Story.

Adapted from Paul Aurandt’s
MORE OF PAUL HARVEY’S THE REST OF THE STORY

Angelica Panganiban's Ginebra Calendars original chubby pictures to sexy one.

Hey Guyz Look At This
From This---------------->


To This------------------->

See how technology works...
I'm glad I chose the Information Technology Course, now I know some edited stuff...
Show Business makes our eyes see what they want us to see, it make us blind of what the real thing is. These Pictures are just a product of today's technology called photoshop, from chubby to super sexy? Want also to try?
But we can't blame them. Actually I like the pictures and I admire the one who edited it.

OJT at Sampaguita Gardens Resort

Hey guys look what I learned here...blogging.
"Blog" is short for Web log. It's a medium in which an author writes a journal-style Web site with provisions for readers to respond.Check it out too, it's fun. Just ask me and I will show you how.
I Love This Place

The arguments about the morality of Voluntary Euthanasia (VE)

Euthanasia comes from the Greek words "eu" meaning well and "thanatos" meaning death. It refers to an act or method of causing death painlessly, so as to end suffering especially to those with cancer or in a vegetable state patients. Doctor call it as mercy killing.

Since World War II, the debate over euthanasia in Western countries has centered on voluntary euthanasia (VE) within regulated health care systems. In some cases, judicial decisions, legislation, and regulations have made VE an explicit option for patients and their guardians. Proponents and critics of such VE policies offer the following reasons for and against official voluntary euthanasia policies:

Those who are in favor of Euthanasia cite the following reasons:

1. Choice: Proponents of Euthanasia emphasize that choice is a fundamental principle for liberal democracies and free market systems.
2. Quality of Life: The pain and suffering a person feels during a disease, even with pain relievers, can be incomprehensible to a person who has not gone through it. Even without considering the physical pain, it is often difficult for patients to overcome the emotional pain of losing their independence. Moreover, despite modern painkillers, there is little available to deal with the problem of 'breathlessness', which makes many ailing patients feel they will suffocate.
3. Economic costs and human resources: Today in many countries there is a shortage of hospital space. The energy of doctors and hospital beds could be used for people whose lives could be saved instead of continuing the life of those who want to die which increases the general quality of care and shortens hospital waiting lists. It is a burden to keep people alive past the point they can contribute to society.
4. Pressure: All the arguments against voluntary euthanasia can be used by society to form a terrible and continuing psychological pressure on people to continue living for years against their better judgment. One example of this pressure is the risky and painful methods that those who genuinely wish to die would otherwise need to use, such as hanging.
5. Sociobiology: Currently many if not most euthanasia proponents and laws tend to favor the dying or very unhealthy for access to euthanasia. However some highly controversial proponents claim that access should be even more widely available. For example, from a sociobiological viewpoint, genetic relatives may seek to keep an individual alive (Kin Selection), even against the individual's will. This would be especially so for individuals who are not actually dying anyway. More liberal voluntary euthanasia policies would empower the individual to counteract any such biased interest on the part of relatives.

On the other hand, those who are not in favor of Euthanasia cite the following reasons:

1. Professional role: Critics argue that voluntary euthanasia could unduly compromise the professional roles of health care employees, especially doctors. They point out that European physicians of previous centuries traditionally swore some variation of the Hippocratic Oath, which in its ancient form excluded euthanasia: "To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death.." However, since the 1970s, this oath has largely fallen out of use.
2. Moral: Some people consider euthanasia of some or all types to be morally unacceptable. This view usually treats euthanasia to be a type of murder and voluntary euthanasia as a type of suicide, the morality of which is the subject of active debate.
3. Theological: Voluntary euthanasia has often been rejected as a violation of the sanctity of human life. Specifically, some Christians argue that human life ultimately belongs to God, so that humans should not be the ones to make the choice to end life. Orthodox Judaism takes basically the same approach, however, it is more open minded, and does, given certain circumstances, allow for euthanasia to be exercised under passive or non-aggressive means. Accordingly, some theologians and other religious thinkers consider voluntary euthanasia (and suicide generally) as sinful acts, i.e. unjustified killings.
4. Feasibility of implementation: Euthanasia can only be considered "voluntary" if a patient is mentally competent to make the decision, i.e., has a rational understanding of options and consequences. Competence can be difficult to determine or even define.
5. Necessity: If there is some reason to believe the cause of a patient's illness or suffering is or will soon be curable, the correct action is sometimes considered to attempt to bring about a cure or engage in palliative care.
6. Wishes of Family: Family members often desire to spend as much time with their loved ones as possible before they die.
7. Consent under pressure: Given the economic grounds for voluntary euthanasia (VE), critics of VE are concerned that patients may experience psychological pressure to consent to voluntary euthanasia rather than be a financial burden on their families. Even where health costs are mostly covered by public money, as in various European countries, VE critics are concerned that hospital personnel would have an economic incentive to advise or pressure people toward euthanasia consent.

“I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel”
... The Hippocratic Oath

"A man, even if seriously sick or prevented in the exercise of its higher functions, is and will be always a man ... [he] will never become a 'vegetable' or an 'animal,'" the Pope said. "The intrinsic value and personal dignity of every human being does not change depending on their circumstances.“
... Pope John Paul II, 2004

"If a physician withholds maximum efforts from patients he considers hopelessly ill, he will unavoidably withhold maximum effort from the occasional patient who could have been saved." He reasoned that the only way to be sure a case is hopeless is to try all available therapies and find them of no avail.”
... Lawrence V. Foye, M.D